• Cart$0.00
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Log In

Center for Development and Learning

  • About CDL
    • People
    • FAQs
    • Our Impact
      • Where We Are Going
      • Success Stories
  • Professional Learning
    • Plain Talk
    • CDA Cornerstones
    • Literacy
    • Early Childhood
    • Customize Your Own
  • Resources
    • For Parents and Teachers
    • For Policymakers
    • Articles
  • Contact
  • Give

Blog - Latest News

  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • RSS

Report Cards and Standards

this entry has 0 Comments/ in Articles, Assessment, Literacy, Reading, Writing / by Timothy Shanahan
July 29, 2015

Tim Shanahan

Teacher Question:
I wanted to ask your opinion regarding the structure of report cards for parents of students in grades 3-5. Understanding that ELA CCSS intertwines the areas of reading, language, spelling, writing, and moving toward creating district standards-based report cards in all K-5 grade levels, how do you think students’ progress should be reported out to parents via report cards, as we transition? Would you recommend having an ELA grade on the report card or segregating particular areas as a stand-alone grade?  

Shanahan Responds:
This is less a research question than one requiring professional judgment. I suspect there are many good ways to do this, but I will weigh in with my own take on the problem per your request. My suggestions are based upon what I think teachers and parents can do and use, not on what studies suggest for the simple reason that I know of no such studies.

I definitely would provide students with more than a single English Language Arts grade. Lots of ways to do this, of course: One could provide an overall ELA grade with some subscores, or ELA might not appear at all and just specific scores in reading, writing and some other key areas could be included. I would personally go with the latter, just to keep it simpler.

What grades would I provide?  I definitely would offer a reading grade. In fact, I’d offer two of them. I’d give students a grade in reading foundations (which would be used to inform parents as to how their kids were doing with decoding and oral reading fluency), and a grade in reading (which would get at issues like reading comprehension, understanding of different genres, learning from reading, etc.). That’s divided in the same way the reading standards are in CCSS.

I would also provide a grade for writing, and, again, it would be possible to divide this one in two—writing foundations and writing (which is not how the standards do it). The first writing grade would get at issues of spelling, cursive, keyboarding, hygiene (the old term for basically making a paper look good in terms of all of these physical qualities), and the second would get at writing quality (how well developed and organized and accurate and engaging the students’ writing is).

Finally, you might have a language grade aimed at what the standards address under speaking, listening, and language. This would include grammar, along with listening comprehension, ability to make formal presentations, to participate effectively in group discussions, and the like. While I would not disagree with those who would criticize lumping this all into one pot, I am doubtful of teachers’ ability to easily evaluate 30 students in any of these skills separately. (And, yes, you could slice this differently. For example, you could include grammar in what I labeled as writing foundations, and keep this language or oral language grade totally about oral language quality).

That might be it: under this plan, students would get 3-5 ELA grades (1 or 2 reading grades, 1 or 2 writing grades, and 1 language or oral language grade). If you break something out on a report card, you are making some assumptions: one assumption is that teachers can provide a sound and accurate evaluation of the abilities included in that category; a second assumption is independence, that it would be possible for a youngster to do well in one category and poorly in another; and a third is that it would be worth opening up a conversation with parents about the topic if Johnny didn’t do well in it (in other words, there would be clear remedial actions that a teacher and parents could take to help him to do better in that area). Gradability, independence, and teachability are the key factors.

Many districts try to align their report cards to their standards, but what this usually means is that the report card ends up with so many grades that teachers are uncertain of (e.g., “I have no idea whether kids have accomplished reading standard 4 for literary text”), and parents have no idea what to do with all of this information. If the information won’t be accurate—and there is no way that teachers can adequately evaluate all of those individual standards—and won’t be useful for aiming teachers and parents at addressing student needs, then there is no reason to have it on the report card.

Given that, let me encourage you to consider adding one more grading category to ELA report card. One thing the standards emphasize a lot—not just in one category—but in multiple ones, is the ability to conduct research. That is, students need to learn how to track down information, to evaluate its accuracy and quality, to summarize information from particular sources, to synthesize information across sources, and to present that information accurately and engagingly. Different aspects of that process belong to reading (evaluating sources) or writing (summarizing or synthesizing) or oral language (presenting). However, if research were treated as its own category, it would encourage your school to make a big deal of it; to get students, parents, and teachers all engaged in ensuring that these diverse ELA skills come together into a powerful amalgam that would send kids off to middle school with a strong academic focus. That would only add one more grade to the pot, but it would be a heck of an addition, and it fits my criteria: it is gradable, independent, and well worth focusing on instructionally at school and home.

Reprinted with permission of the author.

Tim Shanahan is a member of CDL’s Professional Advisory Board.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Tags: Timothy Shanahan
← Is Rhyming Ability Important in Reading? (previous entry)
(next entry) Why We Need to Teach Reading AND Writing →
Related Posts
Does a Listening Deficit Predict a Reading Deficit...
How Much Teacher Guidance Versus How Much Independ...
Teaching Reading Comprehension and Comprehension S...
Disciplinary Literacy Is NOT The Same As Content A...
Comments

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Newsletter

Categories

  • Articles
  • Assessment
  • Attention
  • Behavior
  • Common Core
  • Comprehension
  • Differentiated Instruction and RtI
  • Early Childhood
  • Emotions
  • Higher Level/Critical Thinking
  • Leadership
  • Learning
  • Learning Differences
  • Learning Process
  • Literacy
  • Math
  • Memory
  • Metacognition
  • Organizing and Processing
  • Parents
  • Professional Development/Learning
  • Reading
  • Research-Based/Evidence-Based
  • Retention
  • Social Skills
  • Teaching
  • Testing
  • Vocabulary
  • Writing

Main Pages

  • Home
  • About CDL
  • Professional Learning
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Give

Follow CDL

#PlainTalkNOLA

Search

CDL is a proud member of

© Copyright - Center for Development and Learning
  • Send us Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed